Trimis: 21/Mai/2006, 12:51 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

It's a point of view that is perfectly understandable, and relative from a particular perspective. I can't find much vulgarity in Shakespeare, but Chaucer, now there's an English writer that would far more qualify for the appellation.
However you see it, expressions like "Iar ai venit ma,... porcule" doesn't even seem to me Eminescu's language. However that's not to decry vulgarity, nor was it Monica's intent, everyone likes a laugh and his is of world class humourism. For real vulgarity perhap the American David Mamet appears to me to use vulgar slang to such extremity that it even becomes tedious and infectious after the laughter has stopped, and that is where I feel I need safeguards because It can take one over.
Thank's for the view.
Tony
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 21/Mai/2006, 9:56 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

I shall be happy to explain the significence of the insight evidence of a large tract of email trackings on the synopsis page. Does anyone have a question on its validity, interpretation and the unequivocal inferences that can be drawn from them.
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 22/Mai/2006, 3:19 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

Would anyone be kind enough for a small payment, in advance or else a sending of something from the UK in exhange for the service, whichever you prefer, to take a few photos of the property and mail them to the UK Please?
Tony
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 23/Mai/2006, 11:12 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

As I promised, I have posted some new evidence of how contact with Timisoara three years ago, was all a waste of time. If you are interested, have a look at http://www.forceofdestiny.co.uk/Romania
on the exhibits page.
Tony
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 24/Mai/2006, 9:58 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

This does not correspond with reality!!!!

And if you are interested in seeing the case I had with the British Police it has started on

http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/ web page Winter v Met Police & CPS.


Brussels Eases Pressure on Romanian Coalition
With EU entry still on track for 2007, Romania’s centrist government is unlikely to fall any time soon.

By Marian Chiriac in Bucharest (Balkan Insight, 18 May 06)

Romania remains on course to join the European Union by its target date of January 2007, after the European Commission commended its progress in the fight against corruption.

Despite being seen as the most corrupt country in Eastern Europe as recently as only six months ago, Bucharest is now winning praise for combating the scourge.

Much of the thanks for this success is going to the country's
energetic justice minister, Monica Macovei, whose campaign to tackle the culture of graft, especially among top politicians, has encouraged prosecutors to bring charges against former prime minister Adrian Nastase, among others.

In a report on May 16, the Commission said it would give Romania and its neighbour Bulgaria five more months to show that the improvements they have made to their judicial systems and administrations are irreversible.

Both countries have ten more conditions to fulfil, with Brussels
expecting Bulgaria, in particular, to show more tangible results in the fight against corruption and organised crime.

Romania's entry to the club is conditional on an assessment due in October that the country is continuing to reform agriculture and taxation.

"Based on their progress, the Commission will make the recommendation that Bulgaria and Romania should be ready to join the EU as of 2007," the report said.

While Romania was disappointed that it did not receive an unconditional entry date, there is relief in official circles that accession next year remains a feasible goal.

At the same time, political observers believe that Brussels' guarded praise for the government's efforts will help keep the ruling coalition together at a time when it had seemed close to falling apart.

Relations between President Traian Basescu's Democratic Party and Prime Minister Calin Popescu Tariceanu's National Liberal Party have deteriorated recently over Democrat calls for a ministerial reshuffle.

The Democrats say the present four-party centrist coalition is
unworkable, cannot achieve its reform goals and needs a radical shake-up.

The government has also faced flak this year for responding poorly to natural disasters, such as the serious floods that hit the south this spring, when Prime Minister Tariceanu was accused of appearing unresponsive to the plight of those affected.

On the other hand, delays to reforms of agriculture and the fiscal system, which the Commission has singled out as areas in need of attention, have been attributed to the poor performance of National Liberal ministers.

The government's failings have prompted the main opposition Social Democratic Party, PSD, to attempt to launch a no-confidence vote in parliament over the handling of the reform process.

"The ruling coalition promised that people would live well and we want to show they haven't kept their promise," said PSD leader Mircea Geoana.

Geoana said the PSD had postponed its action for several weeks, fearing it might have a negative impact on the country's standing in Brussels.

But with Bucharest now in the EU’s good books, pressure on the coalition is likely to ease - until Brussels issues its next
definitive report in October.

"Without pressure from the European Union, which seeks stability and predictability [in Romania], the present coalition would have broken apart long ago," noted Cristian Ghinea, a political analyst.

"Changes in the government are necessary, but no radical reshuffle will take place until October, when the European Commission presents its new report."

Journalist Carol Sebastian also believes Europe's desire for stability in Bucharest will play to the advantage of the fractured coalition government.

"The country will remain ruled by the same government - even though many people see it as weak - because the EU is asking for stability," he said. "Despite all the differences of opinions between the president and prime minister, they will have to work together in the coming months."

That may be of little interest to many of the 21.5 million Romanians. About one-third of the population now lives below the poverty line and they tend to blame both their own government and the EU for recent sharp rises in the cost of living.

"Prices of food, petrol, electricity and gas have risen by more than 400 per cent since the start of the accession path," said Cosmin Antonescu, who struggles along on less than 150 euro a month.

"The political class in Romania only want to join the EU to learn how to steal more of their own citizens' money."

Marian Chiriac is director of BIRN Romanian. Balkan Insight is BIRN's online publication.
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 25/Mai/2006, 7:21 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

takew the last lines from the previous msg
and

If they are true, then you will need to defend yourselves properly, so if you wish to see how to rebut abuse from the British local authorities, then you can see a draft claim I am preparing against our local council for issuing a parking tocket for 60 seconds, YES SECONDS.
I have had three such ticket this past 4 years, ONE WAS FOR 3.3 SECONDS. Someone has to stop this abuse by those we elect to SERVE NOT RULE. The try to rule by being truthless as they are ruthless.
That may be acceptable to some who have no time to stop, and just pay up. I have time. I also have plenty of time to redress my complaint with th breaches and theft of property, not to get it back, but to deliver back a detriment, since I see clarly as yet eveery person in authority is burying their heads in the sand. OCTOBER is the month to watch and see if any infuence has been respected.

The draft court action in the UK is below.......

the tesxt has been separated from the claim in two sections and will be finalised on Monday, after that it will be on the internet fully on http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/ which may have maintenance downtimes, so if you fail to accesss thos pages then the links will be on http://www.forceofdestiny.co.uk/ if theo other site is under maintenance.
Good luck citizens, democracy means making the powers behave properly.

text below


I refer to your letter dated 17th May, for which I thank you.

Please find enclosed a payment for the above PCN within the time for the discount, but instead for the full amount. You have read my replies, and been advised of this one.

The enforcement is rejected on three grounds, and six categories below, the first part being alleged contraventions of Tort, Code of Conduct, and vexatious proceedings.

a. It falls within the maxim of being petty or trivial and should have been cancelled immediately for its characteristics conforming to 'De minimis non curat lex'. AND
b. Strictly like for like, in error, your warden's false description on the PCN rendered it invalid rand every reason in equity called for its cancellation,, that you have wilfully ignored when pointed to in 3. (a). of my first letter. AND
c. The council's and warden's wilful abnegation of duty in tort towards its electorate.
Banking the revenue will be a clear act of intent, whereas Omission of and ignoring b. above will show relevant 'mens mentis' in the ensuing negatively characterised act that is its converse.

The provisions laid down for procedures in enforcement and appeals is prejudicial since it rarely allows for equity, where an adjudicator's dismissal absolves the appellant giving him no costs for avoidable time trouble and (vexation a separate element of costs arising from intent and wilful omission). Having recently exposed the LGO in a contradiction and sequence of exchanges overlaid with casuistry, sophistry and fallacious logic, the appeals process would be viewed with an open mind while simultaneously with extreme scepticism as to similitude of being agenda driven 'partially' while being described as impartial. Any hidden agenda will become obvious at such a hearing, and noted. I have no objection to the process providing an adverse conclusion is referable for a judicial review, and it has no bearing on the recovery of costs I shall seek in a separate court action for vexation, and abrogation of tortious liability that are discernible from the precise nature of acts and omissions being so related.

I should advise that in civil actions for harassment, I have prevailed in two past cases. One concerned a trivial amount of £1, that caused the defendant to lose their £650 claim on the second court action, and the other over £50 with one of the largest world banks, settling prior to issue of documents with £1650. In this representation I shall be seeking considerably more along with exemplary and punitive damages, due to the widespread nature of the activity, and general and evidential public agreement over the perfidious nature of professing public care while acting to the contrary, as aforesaid contributing to a breakdown of law and order in the community.

........

and
vidence shall be adduced along the following categories and provided at the relevant times.

1.Contextual evidence from which unequivocal condemnatory inferences follow giving insight as to the precise nature of this widespread local government activity at the end of triviality.
2.Particular evidence 'res ipsa loquitur', offences like for like should have justified the immediate cancellation of the PCN, but found the contrary in your letter of 17th.
3.Comparative evidence like for unlike showing the prejudicial nature of this particular enforcement making it a derogation. As well as the intent 'mens mentis' of the warden while I was in distress as well as having disabilities. British integrity and courtesy, and care is all expected to flow from the authorities who are elected to serve and not to rule adversely making a triviality an offence of such magnitude on a regular basis by the hour and second.
4.Incidental evidence of the selective bias and malice aforethought of the warden.
5.Testimonial evidence of contrariety to sections of the RTA 1991 Act.
6.Breaches of other statutory obligations with appropriate 'mens mentis' while in pursuit of this revenue wilfully in negligence. Viz: Tort law and The Offence of Harassment as aforementioned.
7.Policy of claimant in seeking a remedy, where statutory procedure omits culpability that belongs to local authorities where they knowingly, with wilful negligence and malice aforethought pursue a course of conduct that vexes and derogates the claimant in a just case that the PCN should never had been issued had the council and its wardens adhered to their duty of care, where the warden had two clear opportunities to remedy the breach, without consequence, but chose to hide, and behave in predator fashion to a deliberate purpose.
8.Also please note that culpability shall be traceable to the top of directing minds being held accountable at the highest level. Therefore please ensure your decision is supported from a person in sufficient authority prepared to be accountable. It would be an act of misprision if this to be omitted.
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 25/Mai/2006, 10:47 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

I have just update the page on Winter V Metropolitan Police and Crown Prosecution Service, Winter prevailed with costs of £650. I should hopefully finish the synopsis tonight. All the evidence will go after I have done http://logiclaw.co.uk/page6.html


Winter V Thorne Emi, and their insurers,
Winter V Amtrak – is done needs synopsis
Winter V Telewest
Winter V WORLDS LARGEST BANK in top 4 cannot be names due to an agreement on compensation.
Winter V Local Authority coming up and others
They're interesting reading and not too long. A Citizen's charter of rebuttal in abuses.

Don't forget
http://forceofdestiny.co.uk/Romania/page5.html
Just being unravelled now.
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 7:46 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

Scrie-ti frumos! Ne place stilul! Ce urmeaza?
_________________
Constanta

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 7:54 pm    Titlul subiectului: Re: Furt de proprietate

grama a scris:

Scrieti frumos! Ne place stilul! Ce urmeaza?

Urmeaza: ... * gramatica limbii romane (aici 'ti' nu este pronume, sa-l desparti)

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 8:00 pm    Titlul subiectului:

Cezara, a scris corect, Grama.
Scrie-ti frumos , adica a vrut sa-i spuna sa isi scrie in continuare, raspunsuri si noutati, ca sa nu uite sirul, si sa fie la curent, cu modificarile de pe site.Scriindu-si personal, normal ca este indemnat sa isi scrie frumos.In rest , formule de politete de ale noastre.

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 8:01 pm    Titlul subiectului:

Ma mir ca nu se baga si Marius si Octavian Mihaescu aici cu dezvaluri mioritice despre secu, multa UE, aviare si alte alea. Vorba cu tuna si aduna.

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 8:14 pm    Titlul subiectului:

Lia, odata ce intra cu el in dialog/ sau doar bascalie ... si-l intreaba in 2 peri si ce urmeaza ... nu tine faza. Daca nu are o problema de gramatica, are una de semantica. De politeturi 'subtiri' ma ocupam si eu.

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 10:38 pm    Titlul subiectului:

Cezara, daca a intrat cu el in dialog,romaneste, tot una este pentru el daca ii scrie corect sau nu romaneste, in bascalie sau serios.
Sunt curioasa cit timp va mai scrie.

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 11:10 pm    Titlul subiectului: Furt de proprietate

Thank you for this!
I understand how the forces of reaction work, and view the topic as having mostly served its purpose now. I have received an unexpected, unsolicited commmunication from a ministry in Bucharest, and note that private exchanges are no longer visible. Roughly what was to be expected.
There was more to publish, but the topic is now going to be trivialised so there I propose to leave it with you at whatever level you choose to take it further.
Best wishes to all.
Tony
_________________
Re opening a case of theft of inheritance where wilful obstructoin of justice has been recorded and becoming public at the above website.

Trimis: 26/Mai/2006, 11:36 pm    Titlul subiectului:

Really, it was to high for me, every thing from your topic. It was hard to understand what you really want to say.It seems to be enough for you to send us your opinions.We use to discuss our problems, to share different live experience.
I hope you will understand my message, and I appologise if I offensed you some way.