SpaceTime

Space, movement and time are objective realities that exist with or without the interaction of cerebration; the psyche or mind.
Getting to grips with that objective reality requires a sound integrity of correspondence theory and epistemology.
Language with fixed meanings in the use of terms, and logic bound to the three laws of thought are essential prerequisites to the problems confronting mankind today. Add to those sound reasoning from the use of scientific method, syllogisms and contextual inferencing and there is a basis for a beginning. Capital and the unfettered aspiration and greed for its acquisition are at the root of perverting and distorting the true meaning of meanings and thwart clear conceptual thinking because the arguments are revenue driven. Not the best way to think when life is at risk. In the ensuing pages, there are arguments for the return to principles of integrity that have become disciples of money, to the detriment of intangible values of past times, Integrity, Honour, Sincerity, Truth, Justice, Love, and many more.
What's wrong with today's bureaucracy of inflexible template drive machine like with super efficient enforcement lacking humanity and discretion. Parliament in its sovereignty has deemed it fit to confer on local councils, a penal power that is of verisimilitude to the crown prerogative that was bridled in the Declaration of Rights 1668-9. “DoR”
This, when considered within the frame of scientific method and logic is unscrupulously prejudicial. It has revived just as the presence of a bridle is necessary for restraint in penal measures without trial, and the absence that bridle returns the aforesaid fines and forfeitures before trial. That is the element of scientific methodology that shows the de facto repeal of that important tenet in the DoR as arrogating crown plunder to the sovereignty of Parliament, and shuffling off responsibility by conferring toward local councils, those with least noblesse oblige to ensure penal measure are scrupulously and sympathetically handled.
The balk chop logic is in two obvious contradictions.
1. Freedom from Fines and Forfeitures before trial, (being exchanged for penalising before trial with a prickly ring fenced argument is hardly fair), and then
2.Fines and Forfeitures; conferring detriments or subtractions being given different terms (civil penalty and distraint), as if by some magic they now belonged to the opposite & contrary class of conferring benefits / additions towards the recipient not detriments. This chop logic and combined casuistry is at the heart of a menacing penal system than is being strengthened with powers of force to enter homes; a mans' castle and privacy, delivering collateral damage to all therein for the purpose of getting at one debtor. There are many many other ways to bring a debtor to heel with civility and avoidance of bringing war tactics to private homes.
Logic Law, Logic at Law, Logic with Law, Law and Logic, Logic in Law, Mother in Law, just as bad!